Wednesday, 24 January 2018

Looking Back At Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles



Originally published on Set The Tape

The Terminator franchise is one that’s beloved by a lot of people, whether it’s sci-fi fans, those who like Arnie, or simply those of us who grew up watching Terminator 2: Judgement Day on VHS over and over again. Unfortunately, there’s not a lot about the franchise that people actually like.

Before you jump into the comments section and call me crazy for saying this: the first two films are excellent, with the original being one of my all time favourites and a great example of how to blend sci-fi and horror. But ask yourself, after those two, where are the highlights?

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines came out to high expectations, but let a lot of people down for its watered down action, dull cast, boring plot, and a villain that was best forgotten. Terminator Salvation had a hard time straight away because of the poor quality of the third film, and despite having some strong supporters (myself included) it seems to be the film that divides fan opinion more than any other. Terminator Genisys tried to reboot the franchise, retelling the story of the first film but playing with the timeline, and was pretty much universally hated for trying to ruin the only good parts of the series.

The comics have never done particularly well, especially when compared to its closest counterparts like the Aliens or Predator books. There have also been very few good video games, except for some great ones from 20 years ago.

Then there’s the franchise’s one television outing, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, which like Terminator Salvation seems to divide opinion on whether it was actually any good or not.


I’m going to weigh in my opinion straight away, it was good. However, it was far from perfect, and I can understand why those who tuned in for only the first several episodes would call it bad.

The show was a slow burner, choosing to focus on the characters more than the fight against the future machines, or stopping the creation of Skynet. Whilst viewers are happy to watch a two-hour movie with several action sequences and high octane violence, depriving them of this for multiple episodes in order to tell a slower, more nuanced story left many fans feeling short-changed.

The first season really highlighted this. Episode one crammed a lot of stuff into its run time, introducing the characters of John Connor (Thomas Dekker) and his mother Sarah (Lena Headey), getting them to meet up with their robot protector Cameron (Summer Glau), introduced the villain for the season, the FBI officer hunting them down, Sarah’s fiance, and transporting the three of them forward in time a decade to stop the rise of the machines. It was a lot for 45 minutes.

After that, things slowed right down. Instead of car chases, gun fights, and explosions, we were given a story of Sarah and John’s relationship, the pressure John faced knowing his destiny, their establishing a false identity, John going to high school, Cameron trying to blend in, resistance cells from the future, and a chess computer that may end up killing humanity. Not exactly exciting stuff.

Despite this, the first season was able to deliver some excellent set pieces, and some very tense confrontations with the Terminators. It also expanded the mythology of the franchise, introducing Derek Reese (Brian Austin Green), the older brother of John’s father Kyle. Unfortunately this wasn’t enough to keep everyone hooked, and the show lost a lot of viewers heading into its second season, which was a huge shame, because season two is where the show got seriously good.


Yes, the return added more action, but it also played with expectations and took the franchise into some very interesting areas. We learnt more about the future war and about how the Terminators made themselves more human. We also saw that not every member of the resistance believes in John Connor as some kind of messianic figure, and even believe some of his choices were against those in humanity’s best interests.

In the present, we were introduced to one of the more intriguing characters the franchise has ever had, Catherine Weaver (Shirley Manson), the head of a tech company who turns out to be a T-1000 liquid metal Terminator. However, instead of fighting for the machines, it turns out that she has travelled back in time as an ally of the future John Connor to create her own AI to fight and stop Skynet, thereby saving humanity. We also get the shock revelation that the T-1000 Terminators cannot be reprogrammed the way conventional ones can, and literally choose to switch sides because their intelligence is that advanced.

Unfortunately, all of these revelations and plot twists (including a series finale that sees the teenage John and Weaver in the post-apocalyptic future) weren’t concluded as the series was cancelled due to low ratings. The first season’s slow start had come back to spell the end of the show as it was becoming one of the best parts of the Terminator franchise. The show was full of potential that was never reached. It was able to deliver competent action, it had interesting and layered characters, it had a plot that was bold and unafraid to mess with expectations. Unfortunately, it didn’t show this to begin with.

When you mention Chronicles to people, you’re going to get one of two reactions: ‘it was boring and shit’, or, ‘it was great, it shouldn’t have been cancelled’. Those who say the first are the ones who jumped ship after the inaugural season, whilst those who stuck with it grew to love it and wanted the story to be resolved, because god damn it, that cliffhanger is not the way to leave things!

If you watched the first season and didn’t think much of it, I urge you to go back and re-watch it and stick with it through to season two. If you never saw it at all, go and watch the whole thing. The show gets too much hate for what it was, and is in no way the low point of the franchise (I’m looking at you Genisys). It’s about time people gave this missed gem another shot.


Go to Amy's Blog

Monday, 22 January 2018

Power Rangers Lord Drakkon Legacy Figure Announced



Lord Drakkon, the popular evil alternative universe version of Tommy Oliver introduced in BOOM! Studio's ongoing Mighty Morphin Power Rangers comic, has been announced as the latest addition to the Legacy line, with an action figure being released at Power Morphicon 6 in 2018.

The event, the official Power Rangers convention, will take place on August 17th - 19th in Anaheim, California.

The Lord Drakkon figures will be available to buy at the event to those with memberships, with different memberships limiting the number of figures that can be bought, ranging from two to ten figures.

The figures will sell for $50 each, and are sure to be highly popular. No images of the figures have yet been released.


Go to Amy's Blog

Eccentric Earth Podcast Episode 4 - Elizabeth Fry



Join me, your host Amy Walker, as I delve into stories from across history. This week I'm joined by Chris Haigh to talk about the amazing Elizabeth Fry, and her campaign to make the world a better place.


Show Notes: Episode Four Show Notes

Twitter: @Eccentric_Earth
Facebook: @eccentricearth
Instagram: Eccentric_Earth
Email: EccentricEarth@outlook.com

iTunes: Eccentric Earth
aCast: Eccentric Earth
Podbean: Eccentric Earth

Eccentric Earth is a Trans-Scribe Production
Hosted by Amy Walker
Theme music http://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music

Eccentric Earth Episode Four Show Notes



Welcome to the latest show notes for Eccentric Earth, where I will include the research for each episode (essentially my script), along with a number of photographs and documents.


Episode Four- Fry's Crusade

Elizabeth Gurney was born on 21st May 1780 in Gurney Court, off Magdalen Street, Norwich, Norfolk, England into a prominent Quaker family. The Gurney family were descendants of Hugh de Gournay, Lord of Gournay, one of the Norman noblemen who accompanied William the Conqueror to England in 1066. In the 17th Century the family had become devout Quakers, and moved to Norwich, becoming active in the woollen trade. Ten years before Elizabeth’s birth, her father had also entered the world of banking, having established Gurneys Bank in the city. The Quaker bank became renowned for its honesty, reliability and fair dealings, and so people entrusted the Gurney family with their money for safekeeping, making the Gurney family one of the most respected in Norwich . Elizabeth’s mother, Catherine, also came from a banking family, the Barclays, who were among the founders of Barclays Bank.
Elizabeths mother was an incredibly progressive woman, and believed all girls should be educated, she also instilled her children with good values, she believed that it was the responsibility of rich people to help others through charity work. She took her children to visit poor families, often bringing them food and clothing. Whilst Elizabeth wrote that she did not like her lessons much at this young age, bored with subjects such as Latin, she did develop a deep love and curiosity for nature.
Unfortunately, her mother died when Elizabeth was twelve years old. As one of the oldest girls in the family, Elizabeth then became partly responsible for the care and education of the younger children, including her brother Joseph John Gurney, a philanthropist in later life, and her sisters Louisa Gurney Hoare, who would go on to be a writer on education.
Earlham Hall, Elizabeth's childhood home.

Following the death of her mother Elizabeth's father paid for a teacher for her and her siblings, and Elizabeth studied history, geography and French. Elizabeth had a friend, Amelia Alderson. Amelia's father was a member of the Corresponding Society group that advocated universal suffrage and annual parliaments. At the Alderson home Elizabeth was introduced to the ideas of Mary Wollstonecraft, Tom Paine and William Godwin. Amelia's father talked to the girls about politics and new ideas, something that was rarely done at the time. Elizabeth was excited by new ideas. She wore a French hat to celebrate the French Revolution and was often seen in brightly coloured clothes, and became well known for wearing purple boots.

Elizabeth could be obstinate but she was always very concerned for others. Before the age of 15, she asked her father several times to take her to see the women at the House of Correction in Norwich. Eventually he gave way, and they went. Elizabeth held her father's hand tightly as she watched the poor women. On returning home she contrasted their lives and surroundings with her own and asked: "If this is the world, where is God?"
William Savery.
As a teenager, she became sympathetic to the Republican views of Thomas Paine, through links with a member of the Corresponding Society, most likely her friend Amelia’s father.
She attended the Sunday Quaker meetings but paid little attention. However, when Elizabeth was eighteen she heard the American Quaker and abolitionist, William Savery, preach in. She was incredibly moved by what she heard in the meeting, and later said, "I have felt there is a God".
Elizabeth begged her father to invite Savery to dinner. Afterwards she wrote in her diary: "Today I felt there is a God. I loved the man as if he was almost sent from heaven - we had much serious talk and what he said to me was like a refreshing shower on parched up earth."
After meeting William Savery, Elizabeth decided to devote her energies to helping those in need. Over the next few years she collected old clothes for the poor, visited the sick and realising that many poor children were never afforded the opportunity to learn, and most never went to school, started a Sunday School for poor children in her own home.
She began to be more serious and her family noticed the change in Elizabeth. She went to London but found the theatres and other entertainments 'artificial'.
Then, whilst visiting her cousin in Coalbrookdale, she met an elderly Quaker, called Deborah Darby. At one meeting this lady rose to her feet, pointed at Elizabeth and said, "Thou shalt be a light to the blind, speech to the dumb and feet to the lame."                                                                        Elizabeth saw this as a sign from God.  
The trappings of society became less interesting to her. She wrote in her diary, "I felt myself under the shadow of the wing of God ...  I know now what the mountain is I have to climb." She decided to be a "plain" Quaker and gave up her fashionable clothes for a simply cut dress and a high, white linen cap.
In July 1799, Elizabeth was introduced to Joseph Fry, a banker and part of the Fry's chocolate-making family. Fry, a shy plain Quaker,  asked her to marry him. At first she refused but, the following year, when she was 20 years old, on 19th August 1800, they married. Elizabeth moved to London. The Frys were rich enough to employ servants and this allowed Elizabeth to continue her work.
Artist depiction of London's poor.
Elizabeth began visiting the poor and was appointed by the Friends of Gracechurch Street Meeting, as a visitor to the school and workhouse at Islington. In her quiet way she was very determined. One day Elizabeth was talking to a beggar holding a half-clothed infant, very ill with whooping-cough. It became clear the child did not belong to the beggar. The woman tried to elude Elizabeth but she followed her despite the danger. She found, in a filthy house, a number of sick and neglected infants.
The next day she sent a doctor to tend the children but they had disappeared. It turned out that these were parish children, kept by the woman purely to gain money from the authorities as their nurse. If they died, their deaths were concealed. Such situations were not uncommon and it was not always possible for Elizabeth to help but she did what she could.
In 1808, Jospeh's father died and early the next year Elizabeth moved from the city to live in the now vacant Plashet House, in East Ham.
In Plashet, she set up a girls' school, tended the sick in the local community and encouraged mothers to have their children vaccinated. She was also an excellent speaker and, by 1811, was recorded as a Quaker minister, travelling long distances to minister.
Despite these good works, the demands of motherhood occupied most of her time: between the years of 1800 and 1812 she had given birth to eight children. She wrote in her diary, "I fear that my life is slipping away to little purpose."
Newgate Prison, London.
In 1813, however, she was to make a visit that would change her life. Stephen Grellet, a family friend, had visited Newgate Prison and was appalled at what he saw. Elizabeth immediately enlisted some friends to make clothes for the near-naked children he described. The next day she went to the women's section of the prison. What she saw horrified her. 300 women (convicted criminals and those yet to be tried) and numerous children crowded together in two small, stinking wards.  
All types of criminals were mixed together, the hardened criminals and the young, first-time offenders. She saw women stripping off clothes from a dead baby to give them to another child. The female prisoners slept on the floor without nightclothes or bedding. The women had to cook, wash and sleep in the same cell.  Many of the women and the children were sick. On a second visit, Elizabeth handed out more clothes and bedding she had collected for them.
Elizabeth was unable to return to Newgate for three years because of two more pregnancies, poor health and the death of her daughter Betsy, aged 5, but the memory never left her. In 1816, she went back to the prison. At the gate the turnkey tried to persuade her not to enter, thinking she would be in danger. She went in and found the women fighting. She prayed for them and on one visit she turned to them and asked, "Is there not something we can do for these innocent little ones?"
The women stopped fighting and began to talk about what they could do. For the first time they felt that somebody cared about their children and this touched them. Elizabeth continued her visits. 
Elizabeth reading to female prisoners and their children
at Newgate Prison.
The women decided they would like to start a school in the prison. They asked Elizabeth if she would help Mary Connor, a prisoner, to get the resources she needed to run it. At first the governor did not think it would work, but, after seeing the improvement in the women's behaviour, he agreed.
In 1817, Elizabeth founded the 'Ladies' Association for the Reformation of the Female Prisoners in Newgate' which helped organise the school and provided materials for the women to make clothes and items to sell. She introduced rules for behaviour, voted for by the prisoners themselves.
For the rest of her life, Elizabeth would devote herself to humanitarian causes, beginning with the treatment of the female prisoners at Newgate Prison. It took many years of perseverance and patience.

In February 1818, Elizabeth was asked to give evidence to a Parliamentary Commission on the conditions in the country's prisons.  Although the MPs were impressed with Elizabeths's work, they disapproved of some of her ideas.  
With her brother Jospeh Gurney, she also took up the cause of abolishing capital punishment. At that time in England, over 200 offences were punishable by hanging, including being in the company of gypsies for more than a month, damaging Westminister bridge, cutting down young trees, Impersonating a Chelsea pensioner, and writing a threatening letter. 
Elizabeth and her brother, Joseph, pleaded to the Home Secretary, Lord Sidmouth, for the lives of Charlotte Newman and Mary Ann James, accused of forgery, and Harriet Skelton, who had passed forged banknotes under pressure from her husband, all of whom were sentenced to death. In April 1818, Sidmouth rejected their arguments and insisted the executions went ahead. Lord Sidmouth warned that Fry and other reformers were dangerous people as they were trying to "remove the dread of punishment in the criminal classes".
Queen Charlotte.
That same month, Elizabeth went to the Mansion House and met with Queen Charlotte, wife of  George the third. After this her work became well-know and her life very busy.
During the bitter winter of 1819 to 1820, she set up a 'Nightly Shelter' in London after seeing the body of a young boy in the street, and in Autumn 1818 Elizabeth and her brother Joseph went on a tour of prisons in Scotland and the north of England. They found conditions as bad, if not worse, than Newgate.  
After their tour, Joseph and Elizabeth published a report of what they saw. It was also during 1818 that Thomas Fowell Buxton, Elizabeth's brother-in-law, was elected as MP for Weymouth. He was now able to promoted Elizabeth's work in the House of Commons. 
In the autumn of 1820, Elizabeth, with her husband and two elder daughters, undertook a journey that included visits to many of the most important prisons in Britain. They strove to establish visiting committees where they did not exist.  
They visited Nottingham, Lincoln, Wakefield, Doncaster, Sheffield, Leeds, York, Durham, Newcastle, Carlisle, Lancaster and Liverpool besides many others. This was just one of many tours of prisons Elizabeth would make during her life. 
By 1820, Elizabeth Fry had become a well-known personality in Britain. It was extremely unusual for a woman to be consulted by men on a professional basis.  Elizabeth was criticised for playing this role and was attacked in the press for neglecting her family.
Elizabeth was undeterred. In 1821 she formed the 'British Ladies' Society for Promoting the Reformation of Female Prisoners', uniting the ladies' groups that had sprung up across the country. This organisation would campaign for many improvements: in British prisons, on the convict ships, and in Australia. It also set up establishments for destitute women leaving prison.
The next Home Secetary, Sir Robert Peel, was more sympathetic to the cause and reforms were introduced. The reforms (including the 1823 Gaols Act) saw women prisoners guarded by other women and allowed regular visits from prison chaplains. The prisoners were also given things to do that helped them develop skills and were taught how to read, and gaolers were to be paid. The reforms, however, did not apply to debtors' prisons or local town gaols.
Although prison reform was Elizabeth's main concern, she continued to campaign for the poor. In 1824, she took a holiday in Brighton where she was shocked by the large number of beggars in the streets. She established a team of voluntary visitors who would go into the homes of the poor, where they would provide help and comfort.  The scheme - the Brighton District Visiting Society - was a great success and soon there were District Visiting Societies in towns all over Britain.
Elizabeth also had her own problems to face. In November 1828, Joseph Fry was declared bankrupt. Although not involved in her husband's business dealings, the bankruptcy affected her good name. There were totally unfounded rumours that money from her charities had been used to support the bank. Elizabeth's brother, Joseph Gurney, took over Fry's business interests and made arrangements for all debtors to be paid and for Elizabeth to receive £1,600 a year. This enabled her to carry on her work.
During her many prison and hospital visits, one of the main things that concerned Elizabeth was the treatment of the mentally ill. She asked that the practice of idle visits to stare at the insane be stopped. In correspondence to St. Petersburg she recommended that inmates be treated with the same consideration as sane people and be allowed to exercise in the open air. She felt that all but the violent should dine together at a table covered with a cloth and furnished with plates and spoons.  
Florence Nightingale was heavily influenced
by Elizabeth Fry's work.

The Dowager Empress, visiting in 1828, followed this advice and was delighted with the results. 
Another concern of Elizabeth's was the quality of nursing staff. She started a training school for nurses  in Guys Hospital in 1840. The nurses were dressed in uniforms and instructed to attend to both the patients' spiritual and physical needs. Florence Nightingale was influenced by Elizabeth's views on the training of nurses and, when Florence went to the Crimea, she took a group of Elizabeth's nurses with her.
For half a century, Elizabeth's whole life was dedicated to the poor. She spoke widely on these issues and became well known in society. She had her critics, some said she enjoyed her status too much, attracting attention from dignitaries and even royalty but she was supported by her husband, family and the love of the people that she helped. 
Queen Victoria took a close interest in her work and the two women met several times. Victoria gave her money to help with her charitable work. In her journal, Victoria wrote that she considered Fry a "very superior person". It is claimed that Victoria, who was forty years younger than Elizabeth Fry, might have modelled herself on this woman who successfully combined the roles of mother and public figure.

One prisoner, on her way to a transportation ship, called out to Elizabeth, "Our prayers will follow you, and a convict's prayers will be heard."
Between 1838 and 1842 she carried her work to European prisons in France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Prussia and Switzerland. Elizabeth continued to work, whenever she was able, until she died on 12th October 1845, although during the last years of her life she became very weak. Her remains were buried in the Friends' burial ground at Barking. Over 1,000 people stood in silence as her body was buried – a mark of respect for a truly remarkable woman.
There are a number of memorials which commemorate places where Fry lived. There are plaques located at her birthplace of Gurney Court in Norwich; her childhood home of Earlham Hall; St. Mildred's Court, City of London, where she lived when she was first married; and Arklow House, her final home and place of death in Ramsgate. Her name heads the list on the southern face of the Reformers Monument in Kensal Green Cemetery, London.
Due to her work as a prison reformer, there are several memorials to Elizabeth Fry. One of the buildings which make up the Home Office headquarters, 2 Marsham St, is named after her. She is also commemorated in prisons and courthouses, including a terracotta bust in the gatehouse of HM Prison Wormwood Scrubs and a stone statue in the Old Bailey. The Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies honours her memory by advocating for women who are in the criminal justice system. They also celebrate and promote a National Elizabeth Fry Week in Canada each May.
Elizabeth Fry as depicted on the back of the £5 note.

Elizabeth Fry is also commemorated in a number of educational and care-based settings. The University of East Anglia's School of Social Work and Psychology is housed in a building named after her. There is an Elizabeth Fry Ward at Scarborough General Hospital in North Yorkshire, United Kingdom. A road is named for Fry at Guilford College, a school in Greensboro, North Carolina, which was founded by Quakers. There is a bust of Elizabeth Fry located in East Ham Library, Newham Borough of London.

Quakers also acknowledge Elizabeth Fry as a prominent member. Her grave at the former Society of Friends Burial Ground, located off Whiting Avenue in Barking, Essex, was restored and received a new commemorative marble plinth in October 2003. In February 2007, a plaque was erected in her honour at the Friends Meeting House in Upper Goat Lane, Norwich. Fry is also depicted in the Quaker Tapestry, on panels E5 and E6. She is also honoured by other Christian denominations. In the Lady Chapel of Manchester's Anglican Cathedral, one of the portrait windows of Noble Women on the west wall of the Chapel features Elizabeth Fry. The Church of England includes her on its liturgical calendar on Oct. 12.
Since 2001, Fry has been depicted on the reverse of £5 notes issued by the Bank of England. She is shown reading to prisoners at Newgate Prison. The design also incorporates a key, representing the key to the prison which was awarded to Fry in recognition of her work. However, as of 2016, Fry's image on these notes will be replaced by that of Winston Churchill. She was one of the social reformers honoured on an issue of UK commemorative stamps in 1976.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can find Eccentric Earth on a number of podcast providers, including:
iTunes: Eccentric Earth
PodBean: Eccentric Earth

You can also follow Eccentric Earth on a number of social media sites:

Twitter: @Eccentric_Earth
Facebook: @EccentricEarth
Instagram: Eccentric Earth

You can watch out episodes over on Youtube too! Eccentric Earth Youtube Channel

Friday, 19 January 2018

Star Trek: New Visions Volume 6 - Book Review



Originally published on Set The Tape

Star Trek: New Visions is a strange comic book series. There’s no art inside the pages of this book. Instead, the story is told in a photo montage style, using images from the original Star Trek television show, as well as new computer generated elements, to tell original stories.

The sixth volume collects together three issues of the series: issue #15 ‘The Traveller’, issue #16 ‘Time Out of Joint’, and issue #17 ‘All the Ages Frozen’. Whilst most comic series tell a story across several issues, bringing them together in one story in the graphic novels, Star Trek: New Visions tells a complete and self contained story in each of their issues, meaning that we get treated to three different and distinct Star Trek adventures in one book.

In the first story the crew of the Enterprise come across a mysterious ship, home to a humanoid entity called The Traveller, who is at war with a mysterious race. The second story has the Enterprise come under attack by strange aliens with a power over time, shifting Kirk through his own timeline. And the third story sees the crew going in search of missing Federation scientists, but discovering a long lost civilisation instead.

The stories are well told, and despite only being a single issue long, have a well put together pace, never feeling too short, but not overstaying their welcome. This quicker, snappy pace feels very much in line with the classic Star Trek series; a show that very rarely told stories over more than one episode, and often had plots move quickly.


The writing captures this feel incredibly well, with a great deal of the dialogue fitting in with the original show. The writing never feels too high concept, and a lot of the story is told in simple ways, and whilst this may put some people off, it does make it fall more in line with the show that it’s emulating.

The biggest issue for myself, however, is the artwork in the book. Photo comics are always a stand out, because they’re very rarely done in the industry. Whilst in many cases this comes down to people not always being able to create the kinds of images they want, Star Trek: New Visions is able to draw from the original series in order to tell its stories.

This means that this is the comic that looks more like Star Trek than any other book you’ll read, because it’s made from Star Trek. However, the panels are made up from several different elements, and can often feel slightly off. Dimensions and sizes are sometimes wrong, colours don’t always match, and characters can appear like they’re not quite real.

This sense of something not quite right is often compounded when images from the original series are combined with completely new CGI images, where it’s very obvious that we’re not looking at images of the show, but photoshopped pictures. Perhaps it’s just me, but this makes the book hard to read in places? This may not be an issue for everyone, but it’s possible that it may drag you out of the book and spoil your experience.

Overall, Star Trek: New Visions is a well made and competently made book, with some interesting and engaging stories within its pages, but an interesting and unique art style may put some people off.


Go to Amy's Blog

Tuesday, 16 January 2018

Looking Back At The Maze Runner



Originally published on Set The Tape

Perhaps it says a lot about the current political and social climate of the world when all you need to do is look at teen movies to see how things have shifted in the last dozen years. Whilst at one time you’d have stories about navigating the dramas of high school, like Mean Girls, or stories about teens desperate to lose their virginity, such as American Pie or Kevin and Perry Go Large, today it’s about horrific futures and desperate fights for survival.

Whilst this arguably provides much more interesting stories, it can lead to a market place filled with a lot of very similar films; The Hunger Games, The Divergent Series, and The Maze Runner were all released in quick succession of one another. Because of the huge popularity of The Hunger Games and the push of this kind of fiction, I ended up missing The Maze Runner when it was first released, and didn’t actually get around to watching it until the second film was out, doing the two of them back-to-back.

Where The Hunger Games and Divergent presented worlds that were ruled by totalitarian governments, with people forced into lives that they didn’t want or were just downright exploitative, The Maze Runner actually managed to subvert expectations by focusing small.

Over the course of the rest of The Maze Runner series we find out more about the world, the evil government/company behind everything, and the apocalypse that befell the Earth, the first film doesn’t really give us any of this. Instead, it focuses on a small cast of characters who begin knowing as much as the audience does, dumped into the centre of a gigantic shifting maze without memory of who they are.


It’s a bold choice. It doesn’t provide any answers about what is really happening until the final few minutes of the film (and we find out later that most of these revelations shouldn’t be trusted), but it really works.

This is a film set in a post apocalypse future, but that doesn’t matter here. The Maze Runner is a mystery before anything else. Who are these people? Why are they in the maze? Who built the maze How do they escape? What are the mysterious creatures that dwell within? These are the important questions.

Thankfully, the film is good at letting these mysteries play out slowly, letting you get used to one part of the world before introducing more intrigue, or providing answers, such as the slow introduction to the Grievers, the monsters living within the walls of the maze.

The cast, though young, are able to carry the film incredibly well, managing to keep it engaging and entertaining even when nothing is happening. Dylan O’Brien is good in the role of Thomas and is believable in his arc, going from scared and confused outsider to a brave and competent leader. It doesn’t feel forced or unbelievable like this kind of role can do, and he doesn’t have the arrogance or unlikable qualities that surround characters like Katniss from The Hunger Games.


The best characters, however, are probably Thomas Brodie-Sangster’s Newt and Ki Hong Lee’s Minho. Two characters that begin the film in positions of power over Thomas, become mentors to him, friends and equals, and eventually look to him as their leader. Their arcs in this first film are complex ones, as their relationships with Thomas change drastically, yet they manage to feel very natural and believable. Most importantly, though, is that both of these characters are incredibly likable throughout, so it comes as no surprise that they go on to survive the Maze and will become important characters in the rest of the series.

The weakest link is Kaya Scodelario as Teresa, the only female member of the young cast. Unlike the male cast members she never quite feels comfortable in her role. Perhaps this is an intentional choice on the part of the filmmakers for developments that will happen to her character in the sequel, but here it feels slightly out-of-place.

Overall, The Maze Runner is very enjoyable and that manages to stand out against the other teen apocalypse movies from the same time. Overlooked because it lacked the star cast of The Hunger Games, it delivers a much more engaging and entertaining film than its more well-known counterpart. If you missed this upon first release, you definitely need to do yourself a favour and go back catch up before the release of Maze Runner: The Death Cure.


Go to Amy's Blog

Star Wars Forces of Destiny: Leia - Comic Review



Originally published on Set The Tape

Star Wars: Forces of Destiny has already garnered a good reputation for taking a look at the female characters from the Star Wars universe and giving them a chance to shine in the relatively short time that it’s been around. Kicking off the five issues of the comic being released this month is the original female hero of the Star Wars saga, Princess Leia.

Set on the frozen world of Hoth shortly before the events of Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, this issue follows Princess Leia as she and a handful of other Star Wars heroes search the icy wastes of Hoth looking for a crashed Rebel ship that will help them to repair their damaged power generator.

Princess Leia is put into a position where she is representing the will to carry on, feeling as tired and run down as the rest of the Rebels around her, but putting on a brave face, giving inspirational speeches, and pushing her people to carry on. All while also having to deal with an incredibly unruly Tauntaun.

The book manages to mix together the sense of desperation that the Rebels are feeling with a nice amount of humour as Princess Leia is constantly battling against an animal that would rather dig around in the snow and throw her off its back than do what it’s told. This helps the book from ever feeling too overly serious or grim, but the balance with the real emotions that the characters would be feeling helps to prevent the book from falling into the realms of too comedic or childish.

The story also manages to capture the banter between Han Solo and Princess Leia quite well, with a snarky back and forth between the two of them that we know is close to building to the beginning of their love story. Not only does this help the book feel more in line with the period it’s set in, but also gives Han something to do because, as with all Star Wars: Forces of Destiny stories, the men aren’t the heroes here.

Princess Leia is the focus, she’s the emotional heart, she’s the one who finds herself in jeopardy, and she’s the one who gets herself out of it (well, with a little help from her Tauntaun too).

The story doesn’t mess with the established timeline of events, and fits neatly into the story of Star War: The Empire Strikes Back, with a throwaway line referencing things living in the tunnels beneath Hoth’s surface indicating that this happens between Luke Skywalker getting attacked by a Wompa, and the Imperial assault on the planet. Instead, this adds further elements to one of the most popular Star Wars stories, giving it some more background detail.

One of the best additions it does make to the events of Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back is showing that Hera Syndulla from Star Wars Rebels is present on Hoth, and that she and The Ghost would have been one of the ships that ends up fleeing the planet during the battle with the AT-AT’s.

This is where Star Wars: Forces of Destiny really does good, showcasing the female characters of the universe, makes connections between the older elements of the franchise and the new characters, and gives us extra layers of detail to stories that we’re already familiar with.

It may be chance that the Star Wars: Forces of Destiny books being released over the course of January began with Princess Leia, it could be because she’s the original Star Wars heroine, but the book coming out a little over a year since the loss of Carrie Fisher makes it feel like a conscious choice on the publisher’s part to put her first. Princess Leia inspired generations of Star Wars fans, even up to her last appearance on-screen in Star Wars: The Last Jedi, proving how amazing she was right up to the end. This may not be a special tribute to her, or to Carrie, but it feels that much more special.


Go to Amy's Blog

'The Jackal' 20 Years On



Originally published on Set The Tape

I have to be honest, until looking into the film to write this article, I had no idea that The Jackal was a remake of the classic film The Day of the Jackal. I know of the original film, I saw that they had similar titles, but it never occurred to me that they would be connected as the plots are so different.

I know now that at the time of the making of The Jackal people were upset, particularly those with a connection to The Day of the Jackal, and that some of this permeated the press and critics of the time, leading to some mixed reviews. But even as a remake of a beloved film it’s different enough and bold enough to stand on its own.

The plot centres around a hit-man known as The Jackal (Bruce Willis), who has been hired to kill the head of the FBI. With only one person able to positively identify The Jackal, the FBI and MVD recruit the former IRA sniper Declan Mulqueen (Richard Gere) to be part of the hunt for the killer.

From here the story is split between the two leads, with Gere’s terrorist turned good-guy working alongside the deputy director of the FBI Carter Preston (Sidney Poitier) and MVD agent Major Valentina Koslova (Diane Venora) to track down The Jackal, whilst we also get to see what the assassin is doing in his increasingly elaborate plot, switching from one identity and disguise to the next as he works his way down from Canada into the United States.

It’s this cat and mouse chase, jumping from one side of the plot to the other, that helps to make this an enjoyable experience, getting to not just see the good guys closing in on the villain, but actually getting to see first hand all of the things that he’s doing, rather than hearing about it later on. These story jumps also help to build tension as the hunt for the killer gets closer and closer, with the characters circling around each other more than once.


These scenes also help to show just how cold and sometimes downright evil The Jackal is, willing to kill anyone that gets in his way. Whilst not just showing us more of his character, these moments build the anticipation and tension for the few scenes where the villain actually comes face to face with the heroes, delivering some great action sequences; one of which actually claims the life of one of the three heroes.

The action sequences are well made, and the final fight does manage to stand out, with a running gunfight through the Washington DC subway system. The action sequences are something a little different from other action films. Yes, it’s slightly over the top, but manages to feel much more grounded and real than many others.

This is one of the beauties of The Jackal: it’s ridiculous and over the top, yet never reaches the level of ridiculousness that was common in action movies of the 80’s and 90’s. It is able to keep a sense of realism and reality that separates it from other action films of the time, such as Face/Off, Con Air, and Starship Troopers.

However, the acting is the main thing that pushes the film to be something a little special, which is solid and competent throughout. Whilst the film does have some big names and instantly recognisable stars in the cast, such as Willis, Gere, and Poitier, it’s easily Diane Venora who steals the film with her subtle yet memorable performance, especially in her fatal confrontation with The Jackal.

Often overlooked due to the sheer fact that it is a remake of a ‘classic’ film, The Jackal is a very strong, capable action thriller with a big name cast, some good cinematography, and competent action sequences.


Go to Amy's Blog

Monday, 15 January 2018

Eccentric Earth Episode Three Show Notes



Welcome to the latest show notes for Eccentric Earth, where I will include the research for each episode (essentially my script), along with a number of photographs and documents.


Episode Three - The Emu War

After the end of World War One many of Australia’s returning soldiers chose to become farmers, moving to Western Australia marginal areas for work, along with a number of British servicemen who chose to make a new life for themselves in Australia.

Things went well for these farmers until 1929, when the Wall Street Crash occurred. Due to the crash many countries suffered from economic depression. Australia was no exception. The country suffered from years of high unemployment levels, plunging incomes, and a lack of economic growth.

Following the crash farmers were encouraged to increase their wheat crops, with the government promising—and failing to deliver—assistance in the form of subsidies. In spite of the recommendations and the promised subsidies, wheat prices continued to fall, and by October 1932 matters were becoming intense, with the farmers preparing to harvest the season's crop while simultaneously threatening to refuse to load the wheat.

Before a resolution to this problem could be reached, things were complicated with the arrival oif 20,000 emus.

Modern day Emu migration.
Emus regularly migrate across large areas of Western Australia after their breeding season, heading to the coast from the inland regions. Due to farmers having cleared large areas of land, and having increased water supplies for their livestock, the emus found that the cultivated lands were a good habitat.

The Emus began to foray into the farmers territory—in particular the marginal farming land around Chandler and Walgoolan. The emus descended on the farmland, consuming as much of the crop as they could, and leaving what they did not eat useless to the farmers.

The Emus were not the only concern for farmers at the time. Thanks to the Emus breaking through barriers and fences the crops also fell victim to other pests, such as rabbits.

With their crops being destroyed, and the Emus continuing their advance, a number of farmers were selected to meet with Sir George Pearce, the Australian Minister of Defence.

Sir George Pearce, Australian Minister of Defence.
Due to many of the farmers being veterans of World War I, they were well aware of the effectiveness of machine guns, and they requested that the weapons be deployed to deal with the problem. The minister agreed, although with a number of conditions attached: the guns were to only be used by military personnel, and troop transport was to be financed by the Western Australian government, however, the farmers would provide food and accommodation for the soldiers, and they would have to pay for the ammunition.

The Government also supported the deployment of military personnel on the grounds that the birds would make good target practice for their soldiers, although it has also been argued that some in the government may have viewed this as a way of being seen to be helping the Western Australian farmers, and towards that end a cinematographer from Fox Movietone was enlisted to document events.

Military involvement was due to begin in October 1932. The operation was conducted under the command of Major G.P.W. Meredith of the Seventh Heavy Battery of the Royal Australian Artillery, with Meredith commanding soldiers Sergeant S. McMurray and Gunner J. O'Hallora, armed with two Lewis automatic machine guns and 10,000 rounds of 
ammunition.

The operation was delayed, however, by a period of rainfall that caused the emus to scatter over a wider area. The rain ceased by 2 November 1932, at which point the troops were deployed with orders to assist the farmers and, according to a newspaper account, to collect 100 emu skins so that their feathers could be used to make hats for light horsemen.

On 2 November the men travelled to Campion, where some 50 emus were sighted. As the birds were out of range of the guns, the local settlers attempted to herd the emus into an ambush, but the birds split into small groups and ran so that they were difficult to target. Whilst the first volley from the machine guns was ineffective due to the range, a second round of gunfire was able to kill a number of the birds. Later the same day a small flock was encountered, and close to a dozen birds were killed.

The next significant event was on 4 November. Meredith had established an ambush near a local dam, and more than 1,000 emus were spotted heading towards their position. This time the gunners waited until the birds were in close proximity before opening fire. The gun jammed after only twelve birds were killed and the remainder scattered before any more could be killed. No more birds were sighted that day.

In the days that followed Meredith chose to move further south where the birds were "reported to be fairly tame", but there was only limited success in spite of his efforts. By the fourth day of the campaign, army observers noted that "each pack seems to have its own leader now - a big black-plumed bird which stands fully six feet high and keeps watch while his mates carry out their work of destruction and warns them of our approach."

Major Meredith with his vehicle mounted machine gun.
At one stage Meredith even went so far as to mount one of the guns on a truck: a move that proved to be ineffective, as the truck was unable to gain on the birds, and the ride was so rough that the gunner was unable to fire any shots. 

By 8 November, six days after the first engagement, 2,500 rounds of ammunition had been fired. 50 birds had been killed. Meredith's official report noted that his men had suffered no casualties.

Summarising the event, ornithologist Dominic Serventy commented:

‘The machine-gunners' dreams of point blank fire into serried masses of Emus were soon dissipated. The Emu command had evidently ordered guerrilla tactics, and its unwieldy army soon split up into innumerable small units that made use of the military equipment uneconomic. A crestfallen field force therefore withdrew from the combat area after about a month.’

On 8 November, representatives in the Australian House of Representatives discussed the operation. Following the negative coverage of the events in the local media, that included claims that "only a few" emus had died, George Pearce withdrew the military personnel and the guns on 8 November.

After the withdrawal, Major Meredith compared the emus to Zulus and commented on the striking manoeuvrability of the emus, even while badly wounded.

‘If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds it would face any army in the world... They can face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks. They are like Zulus whom even dum-dum bullets could not stop.’

After the withdrawal of the military, the emu attacks on crops continued. Farmers again asked for support, citing the hot weather and drought that brought emus invading farms in the thousands. James Mitchell, the Premier of Western Australia lent his strong support to renewal of the military assistance. Additionally, a report from the Base Commander indicated that 300 emus had been killed in the initial operation, more than initially believed.


Acting on the requests and the Base Commander's report, by 12 November the Minister of Defence approved a resumption of military efforts. He defended the decision in the senate, explaining why the soldiers were necessary to combat the serious agricultural threat of the large emu population. Although the military had agreed to lend the guns to the Western Australian government on the expectation that they would provide the necessary people, Meredith was once again placed in the field due to an apparent lack of experienced machine gunners in the state.

Taking to the field on 13 November 1932, the military found a degree of success over the first two days, with approximately 40 emus killed. The third day, 15 November, proved to be far less successful, but by 2 December the guns were accounting for approximately 100 emus per week. Meredith was recalled on 10 December, and in his report he claimed 986 kills with 9,860 rounds, at a rate of exactly 10 rounds per confirmed kill. In addition, Meredith claimed 2,500 wounded birds had died as a result of the injuries that they had sustained.

Troops and equipment were finally withdrawn when the public opinion on the matter changed, with people no longer seeing this as an important cause that would help to save valuable farmland and crops, but as a costly folly. Australia had lost its war against the Emu.

Media coverage of the Emu War.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can find Eccentric Earth on a number of podcast providers, including:
iTunes: Eccentric Earth
PodBean: Eccentric Earth

You can also follow Eccentric Earth on a number of social media sites:

Twitter: @Eccentric_Earth
Facebook: @EccentricEarth
Instagram: Eccentric Earth

You can watch out episodes over on Youtube too! Eccentric Earth Youtube Channel

Eccentric Earth Episode 3 - The Emu War



Join me, your host Amy Walker, as I delve into stories from across history. This week I'm joined by Pete D. Gaskell, as we talk about the only war fought on Australian soil, in which Australia lost. The Emu War.


Show Notes: Episode Three Show Notes

Twitter: @Eccentric_Earth
Facebook: @eccentricearth
Instagram: Eccentric_Earth
Email: EccentricEarth@outlook.com

iTunes: Eccentric Earth
aCast: Eccentric Earth
Podbean: Eccentric Earth

Eccentric Earth is a Trans-Scribe Production
Hosted by Amy Walker
Theme music http://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music