Monday, 15 December 2025

Re-Animator - Limited Edition 4K UHD and Blu-ray Review

 


The works of H.P. Lovecraft have helped to inspire a myriad of stories over the decades since their release, with multiple books and short stories drawing upon his mythos, video games set in the worlds he created, and film adaptations of some of his more famous stories. However, film tends to be one of the areas in which Lovecraft doesn't get as much praise. There are films that draw upon the kind of cosmic horror he crafted, such as Event Horizon or Alien which become hugely popular, but there are few actual Lovecraft films that are well received or remembered. 1985's Re-Animator, however, bucks this trend and stands out as an icon of horror cinema.

The first film from director Stuart Gordon, Re-Animator adapts several short stories by Lovecraft that tell the story of Herbert West, a scientist who's part grave robber, part Doctor Frankenstein. Updated for the current era, Re-Animator casts Jeffrey Combs in the role of West, a young medical student who has been developing a cure to the ultimate illness, death. After an opening scene in Switzerland in which he brings his dead professor back to life with horrific results, the film shifts the Massachusetts Miskatonic University, where we meet the passionate young medical student Dan Cain (Bruce Abbott), and professor and researcher Dr Hill (David Gale), who has been trying to study where in the human brain will originates.

Having returned from Switzerland, West has enrolled at the university to continue his studies and perfect his reanimation agent, and is introduced to Cain and Hill. West eventually moves in with Cain, who's seeking a roommate, and shifts his experiments to the basement, where he brings Cain's dead cat back to life in order to convince Cain to assist him in his mission. However, the two of them will have to deal with Dr Hill, someone who's already stolen others work in the past, and now wants to take West's cure for death and pass it off as his own.



One of the things that immediately stands out about Re-Animator is that it has a sense of humour to it that's almost guaranteed to be missing from every other Lovecraft project. Lovecraft was known for being serious in his fiction, focused on the horror and strangeness of his stories; stories that often had terrible ends for the people in them. However, the original source material for Re-Animator was one of his more humorous works, and makes for the prefect material for Stuart Gordon to adapt. There's a vein of dark comedy that runs throughout the movie, one that helps to lessen some of the scenery chewing performances and over-the-top gore effects because these moments now become part of the overall vibe, a movie that's having fun telling it's story and doesn't need you to take it overly serious.

After watching through the film again for this new release I was shocked that it was Gordon's first feature film. Re-Animator has a higher level of quality than other films of that era, especially other horror movies, and has managed to age incredibly well. It feels like the kind of film that would take an experienced film director, not someone who had never been on a film set before. Gordon manages to blend some wonderfully create cinematography and camera tricks with some fantastic practical effects, a solid script, and some stand out performances from its main cast.

Re-Animator is probably best known for Jeffrey Combs, who plays the titular mad scientist, though isn't supposed to be the star of the film. The film really follows Dan Cain, an ordinary guy who finds himself drawn into this world of crazy doctor and zombies. He's the audience stand-in, our vehicle throughout the story, and whilst he is the protagonist it's Combs' West who ends up stealing every scene he's in. Without trying to Combs manages to upstage his co-stars at every turn, and transforms a role that could have been a villain into something of a loveable anti-hero that we want to see succeed. This doesn't mean that other cast members are delivering weak performances by any means, as the film is populated with stand-outs, and whilst it seems that Combs might be outperforming Bruce Abbott at times Abbott is still delivering a strong performance, and carries much of the film despite being overshadowed. 



David Gale manages to match Combs in many of their scenes, and whenever the two of them are together it feels like a battle of wills between their two driven, almost monstrous scientists. It's wonderful to see how their roles seem to shift over the course of the film, with West being set up in a villain role early on and Dr Hill the target of his abuse, yet as things unfold Gale injects more and more sinister elements into Hill until he becomes both a figurative and literal monster by the end. Some of this transformation comes in how he acts towards the only woman in the film, Barbara Crampton's Megan Halsey. Crampton transforms a rather thankless role, of the damsel in distress, into a memorable and laudable performance as the most level-headed person in the film, one who's not afraid to stand up to the overbearing, powerful men around her. Crampton would go on to become a huge name in the horror community over the years, and there are many fans who would hold Re-Animator as one of her best performances.

Second Sight's new 4k UHD and Blu-ray release is absolutely packed to bursting with special features that makes this a set that fans will want to check out. The 4K restoration looks absolutely fantastic, and is the best looking version of the film that I've seen. Whilst this crispness does mean that you might more easily spot some seams in the effects work I found that it enhanced the experience, as you can't help but love to spot how some of the tricks were done. There's also three full length audio commentary tracks, a brand new one with Eddie Falvey, one with director Stuart Gordon, and another with the producer Brian Yuzna and actors Jeffrey Combs, Barbara Crampton, Bruce Abbott, and Robert Sampson.

There are also a variety of interviews included, including with Stuart Gordon and Brian Yuzna, writer Dennis Paoli, editor Lee Percy, and composer Richard Band. There are deleted and extended scenes, trailers and TV spots, and a gallery. There's also an extensive behind the scenes documentary, a feature that looks at the legacy of re-Animator, a video essay on various Lovecraft film adaptations over the years, and a conversation with Barbara Crampton. There's also several art card included with the release, as well as a 120 page book filled with essays and writings on the film. Second Sight have included so much in the release that despite Re-Animator only being an hour and a half long you're going to be spending hours watching everything, and the extra features are going to fill you with even more love for the film.

Re-Animator is an absolute gem of a movie. It manages to be fun and frightening, has a brilliant cast, and remains one of the best adaptations of Lovecraft's work decades later. 


Re-Animator: Limited Edition 4K UHD and Blu-ray is available from Second Sight Films from 15th December 2025.




Support Amy on Patreon

Buy Amy A Coffee

Go to Amy's Blog

Monday, 8 December 2025

Possession - Limited Edition 4K UHD and Blu-ray Review




Andrzej Żuławski's 1981 Possession is a hard film to describe, even in terms of what genre it falls into. Often advertised as horror, though with lashings of fantasy, melodrama, and psychological thriller, it's a unique creature that has continued to disturb and baffle viewers for decades. Once a part of the notorious Video Nasties list, having been banned in the Britain, Possession gets it's first 4K UHD release in the UK thanks to Second Sight.

Set in Berlin during the Cold War, the film opens with Mark (Sam Neil) returning home from some vague spy mission, only to find his wife Anna (Isabelle Adjani) in a depressed state, unhappy at his arrival. She tells him that she wants a divorce, admitting to seeing another man. After a spiral into an alcohol fuelled depression Mark returns to their home to find his son, Bob (Michael Hogben), in a state of neglect. He learns that Anna has lost control, vanishing for days at a time, and acting more and more unstable. Mark suspects that this may be due to her affair, but as he learns more he discovers something much more frightening.

I first learned of Possession through the Video Nasties: Moral Panic, Censorship & Videotape documentary, which covered the wave of censorship that went through the UK as the BBFC banned certain films, almost all of which were horror films. Most of the films on this list are rather bloody, gore filled films that would have fallen into obscurity if it wasn't for their inclusion on the banned list. Possession found itself on this list, but other than having a few disgusting moments, feels incredibly out of place from those others now that I've finally seen it. 



Possession is less of an overt horror film and more of a twisted, almost dream-like European art-house experience. Partially inspired by director Andrzej Żuławski's own divorce, the film feels like an exploration of the complex, destructive emotions one goes through when their comfortable, happy life falls to pieces and shatters their entire worldview. 

Almost the entire first half of Possession lacks any overt horror, and plays instead as a heightened version of reality, where we explore the lives of these people in very relatable situations, even if their emotions are turned up to eleven. Performances are ramped up, with dialogue as likely to be delivered through yells or bursts of physicality than any real sense of sincerity. This makes Possession difficult and uncomfortable to watch in its own unique way as you feel trapped in this skewed, broken version of the world.

The film is probably most known for this in it's most infamous scene as Isabelle Adjani delivers a hauntingly raw, visceral performance as Anna suffers a miscarriage whilst in an underground passage. It is likely the scene that helped to secure the film it's place on the banned list as it delivers an incredibly shocking sequence with very little else than Adjani's performance to elicit feelings of discomfort. Adjani physicality in the sequence is nothing short of stunning as she flails and thrashes against the walls and floor, screams, bleeds, and cries out in agony as she feels the life inside her die. It's a scene that has produced essays and introspection, and even if you fail to connect with the rest of the film it's a moment that will linger with you and be the first thing that you think about when you hear the film mentioned. It's not hard to see why Adjani was nominated for so many awards for her performance in Possession.



Whilst I have been praising Possession that doesn't mean that I consider it a faultless film; and if anything I think I may have failed to connect with it the way others have. Possession has achieved a cult-like following over the decades, and has had academic praise thrown upon it by experts in horror and cinema. But, probably as someone who hasn't had much experience of melodrama, and who was expecting something a bit different, I struggled to connect with Possession. Whilst I found it interesting there were many scenes that I didn't enjoy, I found that it dragged at times, and the things that were interesting to me weren't given enough time or focus for my liking. 

Possession isn't going to be a film that everyone likes, and I'm glad I didn't watch it with my partner as originally planned as I know she'd have hated it, but there are people that have yet to see it that will fall in love with it. I think that's likely a big part of the artistic merit of the film, it's one that will divide people because it's so unique and so unusual. If you've never watched Possession I would absolutely encourage you to do so, and if you enjoy the film this new release is a wonderful way to experience it.

Alongside the absolutely beautiful looking 4K version of the film, which is incredibly crisp and clear, the new limited edition set is packed with extra features. There four full length audio commentary tracks which offer a huge amount of insight and extra perspective into the film that add a ton to the watching experience; as mentioned before, I didn't really connect with the film, but I loved listening to the commentaries so that I could learn more about the film, and I ended up enjoying them more than the film itself. There's a sit down chat with Guillermo del Toro to discuss his love of Possession, which ends up being hugely fascinating. Kat Ellinger provides a video essay on the film, a look at the reception of the film in the UK and US, and an archival documentary. There's also a look at the locations where the film was shot, an interview with the composer, the producer, and director. Add onto that a look at the artist on the film's iconic poster, a making-of, deleted scenes, and a trailer, and you couldn't ask for more. Whether you're a Possession lover who demands more, or simply a fan of behind the scenes materials, this release serves up so much to enjoy. Oh, and there's the 220 page book filled with essays, art cards, and a reproduction of the original script it's hard to know what else you could want.

Possession was an odd viewing experience, one that I didn't always enjoy, but one that was fascinating throughout. The new release from Second Sight is frankly ridiculous with how much extra content you get, and puts some physical media releases to shame.


Possession is available from Second Sight Films from December 15th 2025.





Support Amy on Patreon

Buy Amy A Coffee

Go to Amy's Blog

Wednesday, 3 December 2025

Thousands Call For Girlguiding to Reverse Trans Ban

 


It was announced yesterday that Girlguiding would be excluding transgender children from all of its groups, Rainbows, Brownies, Guides, and Rangers. This ban, which seems to have been spurred on in the face of threats of legal action being taken against them if they continued their inclusion policy, rolls back on previously established pledges that welcomed transgender girls and nonbinary children into the organisation.

As soon as news broke current and former members of the organisation spoke out to express their anger and disappointment with Girlguiding's decision, with some accusing them of going against their pledges of equality. Some even called the decision a 'betrayal'. My wife, who had been involved with Girlguiding since her childhood, attended her final meeting as a volunteer last night as she could no longer take part in an organisation that has chosen to harm a group of vulnerable children.

Girlguiding volunteer Jenny Thompson created an online petition that calls for the organisation to reverse it's decision, and has already received several thousand signatures in less than 24 hours.


Petition Link


Thompson says that during her time with Girlguiding she learned the values of friendship, acceptance, and support, principals that were key commitments of the organisation. However, their decision to exclude certain women and girls is described as 'a step backwards', one that 'suggests some individuals are not worthy of inclusion'.

I urge those who also feel that the Girlguiding decision to be wrong and wish to see it reversed please click the link above and sign the petition, adding your voice to the growing pushback against this cruel, discriminatory decision. 



Support Amy on Patreon

Buy Amy A Coffee

Go to Amy's Blog

Women's Institute to Exclude Trans Women Following Legal Threats

 


The Women's Institute has announced today, 3rd December 2025, that it has made the choice to exclude transgender women from membership, effectively banning them from inclusion.

Trans inclusion in the Women's Institute has been a policy for the previous 40 years, with no demonstratable issues caused by this; yet the organisation has chosen to use the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding the definition of sex in the Equality Act 2010 to mean 'observed sex at birth' as an excuse to roll back this policy. The WI is only the latest group to make such a choice, with Girlguiding banning trans children from being included just yesterday.

As with others who have made the choice to exclude trans people, and as there is no law compelling them to do so this is a choice, the WI have claimed that this choice was made with 'utmost regret and sadness'. These empty words are likely to ring hollow with British trans people, who have heard them over and over and over again as people jump at the chance to bar us from public life, or force us into segregated spaces.

Melissa Green, the chief executive of the National Federation of Women's Institutes released a statement about the decision claiming that they 'had no choice' but to do so. Whilst this is an outright lie, they appear to be referring not to the law compelling them to engage in bigotry, but the threat of legal action from rabidly transphobic members of the public.

Earlier this year the billionaire children's author J.K. Rowling established a legal fund to aid with court cases and legal action against trans people and organisations that were trans inclusive. Rowling herself also paid more than £70,000 towards the Supreme Court case that has emboldened transphobes and resulted in these rollbacks of trans inclusion. Whilst there is no law compelling the WI to ban trans people the simple threat of legal action, backed by Rowling's money was likely enough to force their hand. And is likely the reason other groups, such as Girlguiding, have done similar. The UK is now a place where the threat of court action is all it takes for people to abandon vulnerable minority groups.

Green said 'Incredibly sadly, we will have to restrict our membership on the basis of biological sex from April next year. But the message we really want to get across is that it remains our firm belief that transgender women are women, and that doesn’t change.'

As with other places that have excluded trans people the WI have not detailed how they will enforce this. It may be possible that they will require members to produce some kind of proof that they're women, either a birth certificate (which can be changed), medical records, genetic screenings, or possibly even genital exams. They have also not indicated what their policy or practice will be when a butch cis woman in the organisation is accused of being trans, which is highly likely to happen as previous examples have made clear.

Green continued her empty platitudes and false words of support by saying 'My hope is that the message that the transgender community gets from this is not one of betrayal, but is one of our desire to continue to maintain those friendships and that support. This has been a very difficult year for everybody, particularly for the transgender community, but I hope that when that anger subsides the transgender community will know that we stand with them.'

Unfortunately for Green, this decision is a betrayal of the trans community, and their trans members in particular. The WI do not stand by trans people, because if they did they would not be throwing trans people aside as they're doing now. It's hard to stand beside someone when you make them leave. I can only speak for myself, but when my anger subsides I will not think they stood beside us, I will forever see them as yet another group who said trans lives don't actually matter.

The WI have said that they intend to 'bring forward programmes to continue to extend fellowship, sisterhood, and support to transgender women' and that they intend to introduce a national network of sisterhood groups that will include trans women. Though the main organisation will apparently be a cisterhood only. 

As said earlier, the Women's Institute is only the latest in a long list of groups, organisations, and businesses to exclude trans people, and I highly doubt they will be the last. Transphobes are using the threat of legal action and the backing of rich people to get what they want. There are parts of our government looking to push segregation of trans people that would effectively make public life impossible into law. This is the same government who stripped trans children of healthcare, yet allow that same healthcare to cis children; the same government who created anti-trans education policies that are essentially a new Section 28. 

The UK is growing increasingly unsafe for trans people. Our friends and allies are continually turning their backs on us, pretending to stand with us whilst going along with our erasure. I truly hope that everyone who goes along with this feels sick to their stomachs. You disgust me, you're wearing down my faith in humanity, and you're helping to make the world a worse place. The Women's Institute, Inspiring Some Women.



Support Amy on Patreon

Buy Amy A Coffee

Go to Amy's Blog

Tuesday, 2 December 2025

Girlguiding Chooses to Ban Transgender Children from Organisation Following Threats from Transphobes

 


Girlguiding has announced today (2nd December 2025) that it has chosen to ban transgender children from its various organisations. 

The announcement, posted on their website, claims that this choice comes following April's UK Supreme Court ruling that under the Equality Act 2010 the term 'woman' means 'biological sex', and that trans women should not be considered women. The group, which has been open to and inclusive to trans and nonbinary children for several years, had previously said that they would stand by that policy, but has now chosen to reverse this stance.

The statement makes no mention of the threats from 'concerned parents' that were featured in the press earlier this year following the UK Supreme Court ruling. This unidentified parent, who I personally doubt has any actual relationship to Girlguiding and is simply an angry bigot, spoke to The Times in November, saying that they had written to Girlguiding threatening legal action if they did not ban trans children. They claimed that simply allowing trans children to exist around cisgender children was 'harassment' that violated their dignity and 'creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, or offensive environment'. They also made heavy implications that allowing trans girls to attend Girlguiding meetings would be somehow unsafe for cisgender girls by the inclusion of trans children. Despite not mentioning this bad press, and threats of legal action the timing of the decision from Girlguiding feels awfully convenient and are surely unconnected, especially with billionaire bigot J.K. Rowling financing legal cases against trans people and trans inclusion.

Despite the mention of the Supreme Court ruling in their statement as the main reason for them making this choice it should be noted that there is no law or legislation saying that Girlguiding, or any organisation, must ban trans people following the decision. Despite this, Girlguiding is one of dozens of organisations and businesses who have jumped at the chance to ban trans people in some form. Others, whilst not outwardly banning trans people have instead chosen to enact a form of segregation, such as transgender people being forced into a separate space; a separate space that they reassure us will be equal.


'Guide with Pride' was perhaps a bit of a huge fucking lie.


Girlguiding say that this decision, which no one forced them to make, comes with a heavy heart. They also say that despite deciding that only some children are worthy of inclusion in their group they're 'committed to treating everyone with dignity and respect, particularly those from marginalised groups'. It would appear that their statement is missing the caveat of 'but only for cisgender people'.

The decision that Girlguiding has made is one of exclusion. It's one that singles out certain types of children as 'others', others that aren't allowed. These are children who don't have a space that they can fall back on. Trans girls do not want to be included in boys groups because they're not boys. They're girls, girls who are just as entitled as any other to be included in girls spaces.

Girlguiding has said that more information will be coming in the next week, and I can only imagine that this will include just how they are going to enforce this ruling. Will it become mandatory for any new member of their groups to undergo physical examination in order to confirm they're 'real girls'? Will any such checks be carried out by medical staff, or will it simply be the people running these meetings asking girls to strip for them? If they have no 'prove you're cis' policy in place and simply accept self identification what will they do if they learn a girl in one of their groups is trans, will she be expelled? What happens when some psychotic bigot parent doesn't like the look of a child and believes they're 'secretly trans' and accuses them of such? Are Girlguiding ready to engage in trans witch hunts as we've seen in other spaces that have tried to implement such bans?


Bigots celebrating trans exclusion outside the Supreme Court.


All of this isn't even taking into account that the excuse they're giving for their choice to be bigoted, the Supreme Court ruling, hasn't even bothered to explain what it means by 'born female'. How is being female determined? Is it by chromosomes? This would be fairly ridiculous as almost no one knows their chromosomes, and there are many women with intersex conditions that do not have the typically expected XX chromosome pairing that are still considered women. Is it the need to have a certain reproductive system? If so, what about women born with vaginal agenesis, missing ovaries, missing wombs, or other non-typical genitalia who are still considered women? The Supreme Court have decided that women means female, yet female is not one thing, it is a cluster categorisation, and by simple definition this means that it cannot be an exclusionary group. It's no wonder every reputable scientific and medical body has condemned this choice.

And now Girlguiding's choice should also be condemned. There is no evidence based reason to ban trans people, let alone trans children. Trans people are not committing assaults or violence at any more of a statistical rat than cis people. Trans people aren't dominating sports or setting records. Trans people are more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators, yet they have been made into a monolithic figure of fear, the group upon which all the ills of the world can be placed. Girlguding has made the decision to play along with this. They've decided that some children are a threat, that they must be shunned and excluded. Fuck Girlguiding.

On a personal note, my wife is a volunteer at a Girlguiding group. She was a member as a child, then a young leader, and has found great joy in her time with them, having recently re-joined them. But following this decision she is leaving them. She is attending a meeting tonight, their Christmas party, and it's going to be her last. She is refusing to work with a group that has chosen hate, exclusion, and bigotry over the values of inclusion, dignity, and respect. I doubt that she will be the only person to walk away from the organisation because of this. Girlguiding have made a stupid choice, one that will leave a stain on their reputation for years to come as they walked back on equality.



Support Amy on Patreon

Buy Amy A Coffee

Go to Amy's Blog